Strategy

Planned versus reactive maintenance: the real economics

The same bearing change costs three to five times more as an emergency. Here's where the multiplier comes from — and how to shrink it.

6 min read

Nobody plans to run to failure. It happens because the day gets consumed by whatever broke that morning, and the loop never breaks on its own.

Where the multiplier comes from

The identical job costs more reactively for reasons that compound:

  • Premium parts pricing and expedited freight.
  • Overtime, call-out rates and contractor premiums.
  • Collateral damage — a failed bearing rarely fails alone.
  • Lost production while the job happens at the worst possible moment.
  • Rushed work that shortens the life of the repair itself.

You cannot plan what you cannot see

Planning requires warning. Condition monitoring supplies it: a bearing trending upwards over three months can be scheduled into a shutdown with parts on the shelf and the right people booked.

This is the whole argument for predictive maintenance in an SME. It is not about sophistication; it is about converting surprises into scheduled work.

A realistic target

World-class plants run around 80% planned work. Most SMEs start nearer 30%. Getting to 60% is achievable within a year on a monthly route, and the improvement is felt in the working week long before it shows in the accounts — fewer 2am calls, fewer scrapped batches, calmer Mondays.

Next step

Let's find out what your machines are telling you

Book a free, no-obligation site walk-through. We'll look at your critical assets, talk through what a monthly route would cover and give you honest advice — whether you work with us or not.

No obligation · No lock-in · UK-based engineers